California’s AI safety legislation has highlighted unexpected alliances in politics.
Notable figures such as former US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Andreessen Horowitz, and OpenAI stand in opposition to California’s AI safety bill SB 1047.
SB 1047 is a groundbreaking law aimed at enforcing safety standards for large language models (LLMs) used in generative AI, including ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude.
What Is SB 1047?
SB 1047 is California legislation aimed at imposing safety mandates on large language models used in generative AI applications.
Key provisions of the SB 1047 bill mandate that organizations developing large language models costing over $100 million must conduct safety audits and implement a shut-off mechanism for their systems.
This requirement also extends to LLMs that incur costs of $10 million or more for fine-tuning. A particularly contentious aspect of the bill is the imposition of civil liability on developers for any damage caused by their models.
Additionally, SB 1047 imposes civil liability on developers for any harm their models may cause.
Who Supports the SB 1047 Bill?
Supporters of the SB 1047 bill include Elon Musk, Anthropic, The Center for AI Safety, and prominent AI researchers Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio. They argue the legislation represents a “light touch” approach, advocating for proactive measures before potential issues arise.
Who Opposes the SB 1047 Legislation?
The SB 1047 bill has sparked considerable debate within the AI community, highlighting differing opinions on the regulation of artificial intelligence. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has voiced opposition to the bill while simultaneously calling for federal AI regulation.
SB 1047 legislation was passed shortly before a $1 billion funding round for Safe SuperIntelligence, a new AI safety venture established by former OpenAI researchers Ilya Sutskever and Daniel Levy.
Having navigated through the state legislature, SB 1047 bill is currently awaiting a decision from Governor Gavin Newsom, who faces mounting pressure regarding a potential veto.
READ MORE: OpenAI Chat: Security Considerations
What Is the Current State of AI Legislation in the USA?
AI safety legislation in the USA is rapidly evolving as lawmakers respond to the increasing influence of artificial intelligence across various sectors.
In recent months, there has been a significant push for comprehensive AI regulation, particularly in light of the European Union’s proactive stance with the AI Act.
Notably, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell is spearheading initiatives aimed at establishing robust guidelines that address challenges such as algorithmic bias, digital privacy, and the implications of generative AI technologies, including deepfakes.
Key pieces of legislation currently being discussed include the No AI Fraud Act, which seeks to enhance individual rights concerning the misuse of AI-generated content, and the AI Disclosure Act, mandating that AI-generated outputs must be clearly labeled.
Furthermore, the Biden Administration’s Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence outlines a framework for responsible AI development, although it lacks specific enforcement mechanisms
As 2025 approaches, there is a growing expectation for more concrete legislative action in the U.S., with significant funding and resources likely to be allocated to AI policymaking to ensure the country remains competitive in the global AI landscape.
LEARN MORE: Will AI Replace Cyber Security?
What Are Potential Consequences of SB 1047?
The potential consequences of California’s SB 1047, aimed at regulating large language models, can be significant and multifaceted. Here are some key implications:
Increased compliance costs: Companies developing large language models may face substantial costs to comply with the mandates outlined in SB 1047, such as conducting safety audits and implementing shut-off mechanisms. This could lead to financial strain, especially for smaller startups, potentially hindering innovation in the AI space.
Impact on AI development: California’s SB 1047 bill could slow down the pace of AI development by imposing regulations that some industry leaders view as burdensome. Critics argue that these restrictions might stifle creativity and limit the ability of developers to experiment with new technologies.
Legal liability: By imposing civil liability on developers for harm caused by their models, SB 1047 could create a chilling effect, leading companies to be more cautious about deploying their technologies. This increased liability may discourage companies from pursuing ambitious projects due to the fear of legal repercussions
Shift in AI landscape: If passed, SB 1047 could reshape the competitive landscape by favoring larger companies that can absorb compliance costs over smaller players and startups. This might lead to reduced competition and innovation in the AI field, consolidating power among established firms.
Public perception and trust: On a more positive note, if the bill successfully enhances safety and reduces risks associated with AI technologies, it could improve public trust in AI systems. Increased transparency and accountability might lead to greater acceptance of AI technologies among consumers and stakeholders.
FIND OUT MORE: Teleprompter: How Teleprompters Work (And Why You Need One)
Will California’s SB 1047 Close the US Market for Foreign AI Products?
California’s SB 1047 has the potential to create significant barriers for foreign AI products entering the U.S. market.
By imposing stringent safety regulations and compliance requirements on large language models, the bill may lead to higher operational costs for companies, particularly smaller firms and foreign entities that might not have the resources to meet these standards.
Critics argue that such regulations could discourage foreign companies from entering the U.S. market, effectively closing it off to products that do not comply with California’s specific mandates.
Additionally, the requirement for civil liability could further deter foreign AI developers, as they may be reluctant to face legal repercussions for the use of their products in a highly regulated environment.
This situation could lead to a decrease in competition and innovation within the AI space, as foreign companies might choose to focus on markets with less stringent regulations.
However, supporters of SB 1047 argue that the legislation aims to enhance safety and accountability in AI technologies, which could ultimately lead to greater consumer trust and acceptance.
While the immediate impact might limit foreign participation, the long-term effects will depend on how the regulations are enforced and how companies adapt to the evolving landscape.
READ NEXT: Web Scraping: What Is It and How to Safeguard Your Data
California’s SB 1047 Bill: Will It Affect California Only?
California’s SB 1047 is primarily a state-level piece of legislation, meaning its direct enforcement and requirements apply specifically to entities operating within California.
However, the impact of this law could extend beyond state lines due to California’s influential role in setting standards that other states may choose to adopt or emulate.
Given California’s large economy and significant tech industry, many companies, including those based outside the state or even internationally, may find themselves affected by SB 1047 if they wish to operate in California’s market.
This situation could lead to a broader discussion about AI regulations at the federal level as well, particularly if similar bills are introduced in other states or if California’s legislation prompts national attention to AI safety issues.
Moreover, the potential for other states to follow California’s lead in regulating AI could create a patchwork of regulations across the country, making it essential for companies to comply with varying standards if they wish to operate in multiple jurisdictions.
